Peter and the Watermelon Seeds

Discussion Questions

  1. Is the method of consultation employed by Miss Murray overly directive or not directive enough?
     
  2. Miss Murray has obviously chosen to provide some level of direct intervention with Peter. Do you think that this is important in developing Peter's skills? Should she provide more hands-on intervention with Peter?
     
  3. How did Miss Murray handle the questions posed by Peter's regular classroom teacher? If you were the consultant, would you have responded to the teacher any differently?
     
  4. Do you think that Miss Murray's methods of consultation will enable the teacher (Vicky Jenkins) to handle new situations with Peter as they arise? Is the teacher learning how to identify appropriate goals and develop interventions for Peter?
     
  5. Miss Murray has obviously chosen to work on functional skills within the normally occurring routines of Peter's child care setting. Will this be enough to prepare Peter for inclusion in a regular kindergarten setting when he is five years old? If not, what else is needed?
     
  6. What format would you use if you were responsible for developing a written intervention plan (individualized education program or individualized family service plan) for Peter? Based on the events described in the case study, develop a rough draft of an intervention plan for him.
     
  7. Very little is said about Peter's parents in this case. How important is it that they are informed about what is going on in the classroom? What options for communication with them might be employed?
     
  8. What should the respective roles of the consultant and regular teacher be in communicating with the family or providing suggestions for helping Peter at home?

 

Peter and the Watermelon Seeds Case Story

    


Questions About This Website?
© 2004 Peabody College at Vanderbilt University -- Case Method of Instruction
Campus Box 328 Nashville, TN 37203